°í°´¸¸Á·¼¾ÅÍ

02.3489.9500

ÀüÈ­»ó´ã
¿ù~±Ý 09:00~21:00
Åä¿äÀÏ 09:00~12:00

18½Ã ÀÌÈÄ¿¡´Â ÀϺΠ»ó´ãÀÇ
Á¦ÇÑÀÌ ÀÖÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Á¡
¾çÇØ ºÎŹµå¸³´Ï´Ù.

µ¿¿µ»ó ¹× ±â¼ú»ó´ã
¿ùÈ­±Ý 09:00~24:00
¼ö¸ñ 09:00~18:00
ÅäÀÏ 14:00~24:00

ÀüÈ­»ó´ã ¹× °Ô½ÃÆÇÀ» ÅëÇØ
Á¢¼öµÈ ¼ø¼­´ë·Î Áö¿ø/´äº¯
µå¸³´Ï´Ù.

Home > 7±Þ°ø¹«¿ø

  • 2020 ¹Ú¹®°¢°ø¹«¿ø ¿ÃÆнº[7±Þ] V2 - ±¹Á¦¹ý ÀÌâ±Ç
        2019³â´ëºñ 7±Þ ±¹Á¦¹ý [ÁÖ¿ä ÆÇ·Ê ÃÑÁ¤¸®] ±âº»+½ÉÈ­ÀÌ·Ð(ÀÌâ±Ç/18³â 11,12¿ù)
  • °­ÀǸ®½ºÆ® °¡±â
±³¼ö ÀÌâ±Ç ÀÚ¼¼È÷º¸±â °­ÀDZ¸¼º ÃÑ 32°­/(Á¾°­:28½Ã°£)
°ú¸ñ ±¹Á¦¹ý ÃÔ¿µÇпø ¹Ú¹®°¢°­³²°í½Ã
°­ÁÂÀ¯Çü ½ÉÈ­ÀÌ·Ð ¼ö°­·á/±â°£ 5,430,000 ¿ø 3,258,000 ¿ø (40%)/365ÀÏ/2¹è
»ùÇð­ÀÇ 1°­ ¸Àº¸±â (HD)
  • ¾Ë¸²
  • Çпø±³Àç

°­ÀǸñÂ÷

¹øÈ£ ÇнÀ³»¿ë ½Ã°£ »ùÇð­ÀÇ
1°­ 18/11/08_2ºÎ 1Àå - UNITED STATES vs SMITH (P. 44~50) 57ºÐ ÀÏ¹Ý HD
2°­ 18/11/08_2ºÎ 1Àå ¼îÁ¶¿ì °øÀå»ç°Ç (P. 51~56) 61ºÐ
3°­ 18/11/08_2ºÎ 1Àå - 8. ºÏÇØ´ë·úºÀ»ç°Ç (P. 56~63) 48ºÐ
4°­ 18/11/08_2ºÎ 2Àå - 2. À¯¿£ÀÇ °ø¹«¼öÇà°úÁ¤¿¡¼­ ÀÔÀº ¼Õ»ó¿¡ ´ëÇÑ º¸»ó»ç°Ç (P. 64~71) 53ºÐ
5°­ 18/11/15_2ºÎ 3Àå - Mortensen v. Peters Case (p. 72~78) 62ºÐ
6°­ 18/11/15_2ºÎ 4Àå 2. THE Tinoco Arbitration (p. 79~83) 46ºÐ
7°­ 18/11/15_2ºÎ 4Àå 4. Haile Selassie v. Cable and Wireless Ltd (p. 84~93) 58ºÐ
8°­ 18/11/15_2ºÎ 5Àå The SS 'Wimbledon' case : Great Britain, France, Italy and japan c. germany (p. 93~95) 31ºÐ
9°­ 18/11/22_5Àå - 6. Blackemr v. United states (p. 96~102) 51ºÐ
10°­ 18/11/22_4Àå - 2. Ƽ³ëÄÚ»ç°Ç Àç¼³¸í / 5Àå - Wilson c. Girard (p. 79~108) 54ºÐ
11°­ 18/11/22_5Àå - 14. Sherk v. Alerto-Culver Co. (p. 109~116) 58ºÐ
12°­ 18/11/22_5Àå - 18. United States v. The Bank of Nova Scotia (p. 116~121) 42ºÐ
13°­ 18/11/29_2ºÎ 5Àå 21. UNITED STATES V. ALVAREZ MACHAIN (P. 121~129) 58ºÐ
14°­ 18/11/29_2ºÎ 6Àå 3. FREE ZONES OF UPPER SAVOY AND DISTRICT OF GEX CASE (P. 129~137) 59ºÐ
15°­ 18/11/29_2ºÎ 7Àå 1. CHAMIZAL TRACT CASE US. V. MEXICO (P. 138~144) 52ºÐ
16°­ 18/11/29_2ºÎ 7Àå 5. TRAIL SMELTER CASE UNITED STATES V. CANADA (P. 144~149) 34ºÐ
17°­ 18/12/06_2ºÎ 7Àå. LAKE LANAUX ARBITRATION : FRANCE V. SPAIN (P. 149~156) 55ºÐ
18°­ 18/12/06_2ºÎ 8Àå 3. THE 'I'M ALONE' CASE : CANADA V. UNITED STATES (P. 157~161) 49ºÐ
19°­ 18/12/06_2ºÎ 8Àå 6. FISHERIES JURISDICTION CASE (P. 162~169) 56ºÐ
20°­ 18/12/06_2ºÎ 9Àå 1. POWER CASE ( U-2 ±â »ç°Ç) (P. 170~175) 45ºÐ

´Ü°­ ´õº¸±â

top

±³¼ö¼Ò°³

±³¼ö ÀÌâ±Ç
Àλ縻 ¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä? ±¹Á¦¹ý/±¹Á¦Á¤Ä¡ÇÐ ÀÌâ±Ç ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
±¹Á¦¹ý ±¹Á¦Á¤Ä¡ÇÐÀÌ ´õ ÀÌ»ó ¾î·ÆÁö ¾Êµµ·Ï È¿À²ÀûÀÎ
°­ÀÇ·Î ½Ç·ÂÀ» ¾÷±×·¹À̵å Çص帮°Ú½À´Ï´Ù.
±³¼öÁÖ¿ä°æ·Â °í·Á´ë Á¤¿Ü°ú Á¹¾÷
Àü) ÇÕ°ÝÀÇ ¹ýÇпø ±¹Á¦Á¤Ä¡ÇÐ, ±¹Á¦¹ý °­ÀÇ
Àü) Á¾·Î, ´ë¼º »çŽ °­ÀÇ
Çö) ¹Ú¹®°¢°­³²°í½ÃÇпø ÀüÀÓ±³¼ö
top

Ä¿¸®Å§·³¼Ò°³

top